It’s only been a few months since Apple introduced the latest generation of smartphones with the iPhone 12, iPhone 12 mini, 12 Pro and Pro Max. These are the first iPhones to feature a 5-nanometer processor called A14 and come equipped with 5G.

However, the iPhone 12 models are still missing some features that Android devices have offered for a long time and that will only come with the iPhone 13 (according to the current information and rumours). On that basis, in this article, we’ll look at all the reasons why you should wait for the iPhone 13 and not buy the iPhone 12 series. Catch up on all the latest news about the 2021 iPhone here: New iPhone 13 news hub.

Reason 1: You only have to wait until September

The new iPhone will arrive in September 2021. At least that’s what we anticipate based on the fact that Apple usually launches a new handset in September apart from when we are in the midst of a pandemic. Hopefully this year things will return to normal, eventually.

Reason 2: 120 Hertz LTPO displays

Many high-end Androids have a high refresh rate of 120Hz screens. The iPhone 12 series, on the other hand, has 60Hz displays. Apparently, Apple held off switching to the new technology in 2020 because of the negative effect on battery life, but the 2021 iPhone Pro and Pro Max models are likely to adopt 120Hz displays. This would allow smoother animations and faster reaction times – and an always-on function could finally arrive.

Reports suggest Apple will use LTPO OLED displays for this. Among other things, these displays support the adaptive image frequency without requiring additional hardware. The panels will come exclusively from Samsung and are already used in the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. LG was also considered as a supplier, but according to The Elec, LG will not be able to deliver LTPO OLED screens in large quantities until 2022. Therefore, it is assumed that only the two Pro models of the upcoming iPhone 13 series will be equipped with an LTPO display that supports 120 Hertz.

Recommended!  20 Cheapest Android Phones in Nigeria right now (from N20,000 to N150,000)

The cheaper iPhone 13 models will probably offer a conventional OLED screen and continue to work with 60Hz.

As soon as LG comes into play as an additional supplier of LTPO displays, the standard iPhones will likely gain adaptive refresh rates of up to 120 Hertz. This feature is likely to come to all new iPhones in 2022.

Apple is already using a ProMotion display in the iPad Pro, which increases the refresh rate to 120Hz.

Reason 3: Always-on function

As we indicated above, another feature made possible by these new screens is an always-on function – something that is a feature of Android phones and familiar to those who own an Apple Watch Series 6 or 5. Even when the display is off it shows important information like the time, battery level and notifications. This is practical as it means you don’t always have to unlock or tap your phone to get this information.

This would apparently have been possible with the OLED screen that Apple already uses on all iPhone 12 models, so it should be a safe bet that at least the pro-iPhone 13 models will come with an always-on function. We discuss the always-on iPhone 13 in a separate article.

Reason 4: The return of Touch ID

Since the iPhone X, every new iPhone has only supported face recognition (Face ID) as biometric authentication (with the exception of the iPhone SE 2020). Touch ID, i.e. unlocking by fingerprint, is no longer a feature.

One of the reasons for this is Apple’s decision to provide almost borderless displays, which means that there is no space for the physical home button in which the fingerprint sensor was traditionally integrated. Of course, other smartphone manufacturers also had this problem. The solution: in many cell phones, the scanner is now located directly in the display or under the glass. Even the 2020 iPad Air offers Touch ID integrated into the on-off switch.

Recommended!  New Xiaomi Mi air charge tech wirelessly charges multiple devices meters away

iPad Air Touch ID

Even if the face recognition is secure and fast, unlocking with the finger remains practical – especially while we are required to wear masks and find ourselves frequently having to type in our PIN code. Touch ID would have been very practical in the iPhone 12 series.

With calls for an easy way to unlock the iPhone with a mask on Apple is set to introduce a method of unlocking the iPhone via the Apple Watch, but there are calls for the return of Touch ID to the next generation of handsets so many will be happy to learn that there are rumours that the iPhone 13 will come with a fingerprint scanner concealed under the display glass.

Reason 5: Major camera update

The latest rumours suggest that the next-generation iPhone will have an improved camera. All four models of the iPhone 13 will be equipped with an optimized ultra-wide-angle camera. Offering an aperture of ƒ1.8 instead of ƒ2.4, which means more light will fall on the sensor. This will enable better recordings in poor lighting conditions.

In addition, it is assumed that the improved telephoto lens of the iPhone 12 Pro Max with 65 mm focal length and ƒ2.2 will also be installed in every iPhone 13 model and no longer just the most expensive variant.

Reason 6: Port free – not USB-C

There were calls for the iPhone 12 to come with USB-C instead of Lightning. Obviously, it didn’t, so what of the iPhone 13? Well-known leaker Jon Prosser is certain that no iPhone will ever support USB-C. However, he indicates in a YouTube video that in 2021 the iPhone could completely dispense with ports; relying only on wireless charging.

One benefit of a port free iPhone would be improved waterproofing, as there would be no way for liquids to enter the iPhone.

Recommended!  Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G spotted at Google Play Console with key specifications

Reason 7: A smaller notch

Unfortunately for the notch haters, the notch will remain on the upcoming iPhone, but it will be smaller. Leaker IceUniverse indicates that the width of the notch in the iPhone 13 will be identical, but the height will be reduced. As a result, the notch will take up less space on the display and hopefully be less annoying.

Reason 8: 5G mmWave in more models

Only the iPhone 12 models produced for the American market support the fastest cellular standard to date – 5G mmWave (sometimes referred to as 5G+). That’s because there is already a corresponding network there, in other countries (including the UK) 5G mmWave does not yet play a role – in fact it may be years before it does. But if it does eventually arrive, buying a better future-proofed iPhone will be wise.

According to a report from Patently Apple, that’s exactly what will change with the iPhone 13. With the 2021 generation of iPhones, more models will offer 5G mmWave support.

If you don’t want to wait to buy a new iPhone check out our round-up of the best iPhone 12 deals to see if you could save money on a new iPhone.

Reason 9: A 1TB model is rumoured

It’s a far cry from the 8GB iPhones of the early days. The next-generation iPhone could offer 1TB storage!

Jon Prosser has been saying that the 2021 iPhone will come with a 1TB option since October 2020, and as of February 2021 analysts at Wedbush have added their voices to Jon Prosser’s claim. Stating that their supply chain investigations indicate that the next-generation iPhone will offer up to 1TB storage.

The iPhone currently has a maximum storage of 512GB. That’s probably more than enough for most people, but if you were using your iPhone to shooting the film in high resolution the extra storage would be beneficial.

This article originally appeared on Macwelt. Translation and additional reporting by Karen Haslam.

Amit Chauhan

Amit Chauhan

Amit Chauhan is the Founder & CEO at SearchClap. Amit is an Internet Marketer, Blogger, SEO Consultant, Link Building specialist & Maps marketing Specialist. You can connect with him on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn.
Swiss Bank Bordier to Offer Bitcoin and Other Crypto Trading Services Previous post Swiss Bank Bordier to Offer Bitcoin and Other Crypto Trading Services
I've been using Apple Music since the streaming service first launched. (Before 2015, I bought CDs, ripped them to my iTunes library and synced to my iPhone.) Spotify was another option six years ago, having been around since 2006, but I had a different understanding of music and streaming services in those days. Today I finally said goodbye to Apple Music, and you'll now find the Spotify app in my iPhone's dock in place of the Music app. In this comment piece I will try to explain why. For a less subjective head to head, read our Apple Music vs Spotify comparison review. Too much of a good thing These days we stream everything, not just music: TV series, films, audiobooks, podcasts. And I have a separate service and/or app for everything: Apple TV+ Amazon Prime Netflix Sky Disney+ YouTube Twitch Audible Apple Music Spotify The range of content is so large that the average user no longer even knows which streaming service to start with. But quantity really isn't everything, as you quickly discover when a service introduces a shuffle function. The oversupply of video streaming services has led me back to an old medium: the podcast. Instead of choosing between the many TV shows I've currently got on the go, I prefer to spend my evenings listening to various podcasts, while relaxing with a game of Super Mario on the Nintendo Switch - killing two birds with one stone in a way that's less practical with video streaming. Especially at a time when social contact is being neglected, the podcast is an excellent form of escapism. For a short time I can listen to real people's problems - and forget about my own. Long live the podcast! Thanks, Apple. Hello, Spotify! Listening to podcasts, however, hasn't always been as easy as it is today. And in fact we have Apple to thank for making it so easy. In 2005, Apple noticed that people were doing everything they could to get podcasts on to their iPods, and decided to pay more attention to the issue. The company released a new version of GarageBand with additional podcast features, created a directory of podcasts using the iTunes Store Framework, and updated iTunes to directly support podcast subscriptions. You still had to connect the iPod directly to the Mac or PC to download new episodes, and it wasn't perfect, but it was an improvement. The podcast boom of 2005 didn't last, but it did put Apple in a perfect position in the early days of the iPhone. With the smartphone there was finally a device that could update podcasts on the fly, and Apple finally got it and developed its own podcast app. Nobody else had managed to replicate the iTunes podcast directory before, and suddenly Apple was the biggest player in a growing media industry. But then, all of a sudden: Hello, Spotify. Spotify got it - Apple didn't Apple Music and Spotify each have their advantages and disadvantages. In terms of price, there's not much to choose between them; they are both pretty affordable, with an appealing family package. Apple Music offers cool features such as live song lyrics to sing along to, music videos, exclusive interviews with artists and live radio stations. But Spotify has something else: original podcasts. Just as Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney+, Apple TV+ and Sky invest in their own exclusive series and secure top actors to attract viewers, Spotify uses podcasts. In the next few weeks, the streaming service wants to gradually offer its listeners twelve new formats in the areas of comedy, knowledge, documentaries and news. All original podcasts. All exclusive to Spotify. And Apple Music? If you want to listen to podcasts at Apple, you have to use the podcast app. You don't get Apple exclusives there. Does Apple care? For someone who loves listening to podcasts, Spotify is a better place to go. Here I can put my favourite music together with my favourite podcasts, all in one app. For someone like me, who is annoyed by the oversupply of streaming content in different apps, this is of course all the more practical. But the question that arises is this: why doesn't Apple invest in exclusive podcasts like Spotify does? The money would be there, and so would the demand. Podcasts are more popular than ever. However, Apple does not show complete disinterest in the subject of podcasts. It was reported back in November 2020 that Apple was interested in acquiring the podcast network Wonder, whose founders want to raise $300m to $400m and have a good chance of doing so, since Sony and Amazon are also involved in the bidding war - but not, curiously, Spotify. Maybe Apple is still interested in shaking up the podcast market. What began a few years ago at Apple could work perfectly again. Next post Why I switched from Apple Music to Spotify